Why do Democracy's Beginnings Matter?
/It is important to understand why we should care about the early beginnings of Democracy.
Read MoreTo provide education and encouragement to help the idea of Democracy be alive, vibrant, relevant, and valued.
Please note - the posts are listed with the most recent first. If you want to start at the beginning of a numbered Series scroll down to find it.
It is important to understand why we should care about the early beginnings of Democracy.
Read MoreThis section is about the connection between the war in Ukraine and democracy. In this horrific war, we are viscerally reminded of the power and agency that derives from the desire for freedom and self-determination. We have seen Ukrainians give up their homes, belongings, and livelihoods, tear apart their families, and literally sacrifice their lives. This is done with indescribable pain, yet with force and stunningly powerful determination and intentionality. So, out of a desire for Democracy and love of country, we are seeing many Ukrainians give up everything. Democracy is an enabling mechanism and love of country is at base love of the community of people that comprise a country. The war has roused out of our complacency. We have had our pettiness, partisanship, and narcissism challenged. We are called to care and act about Ukraine but also about our own community, our own country, our own Democracy.
Read MoreThis section focuses on the issue of Power in our species. It takes a particular stance regarding why there is the problem and benefit of the notion of power. We are driven, literally compelled to seek all manner of power for many particular or proximate reasons but there is one essential or constitutive reason. We seek power in all its forms to due to perhaps the most fundamental fact of our existence - we will die. This meta or foundational reality is the contradictory dyad of life vs death.
Read MoreIn this second series, I continue outlining the early years of Democracy. The prior 5-part series, The appearance of Democracy - birth to infancy in Greece, covered the development of the seeds and some saplings (750 to 500 B.C.). This section, The appearance & construction of Democracy - childhood to maturity in Greece, moves forward in time to the growth of a fully formed tree. (500 to 322 B.C.).
Read MoreThis section is the beginning a series of posts outlining and discussing the initial development of democracy. The first one is here. The era of focus is a slightly more than 400 year period, beginning about 750 BC. While this start is in the far past in human terms, nearly 2800 years ago, the issues raised are remarkably relevant to the challenges facing democracy in the present day.
Read MoreI will now begin a third series, The Impact of Athenian Democracy on the re-appearance of Democracy and its further development. First, I will discuss the influence of Athenian democracy on the re-emergence of democracy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and its initial forms. Second, I will turn to the question of whether or not Athenian democracy has any lessons to offer the world of today, a vastly different place than when democracy first developed.
Read MoreDue to its weakened state as outlined in Part 17, Athens stayed away from military involvements during the last half of the 350s. At the same time, Philip of Macedonia continued to expand his reach and aspirations, conquering Thessaly and appearing ready to move into Central Greece and thus closer to Athens.
Read MoreAfter the alliance with Sparta, initial military action was inclusive and sporadic. Athens began to move to re-establish its empire with limited success. Then, after some success by both sides, a crucial battle took place.
Read MoreAs discussed in The appearance and construction of Democracy - childhood to maturity in Greece, Part 11, Athens was considerably weakened militarily due to the alliance between Sparta and the Persian empire.
Read MoreThe basic structure of the judicial system was set by the end of the fifth century. However, in the fourth century there was considerable additional development….The role and control of the Assembly continued throughout the fourth century. There were a number of changes made to increase the involvement of the Assembly, principally focused on making the Assembly as representative as possible and expanding participation.
Read MoreHaving discussed the Council of 500, in the next several posts I will do same for the other key components of Athenian democracy in the fourth century: the Council of the Areopagus, the Magistrates, Defense, Finance, the Courts, and the Assembly.
Read MoreThe most apparent result of the democratic reforms was that for the first time, a wide-ranging, clear, updated, and definitive code of written laws was created.
Read MoreWhile the long saga of dealing with hubris and the focus on seeking power and wealth demonstrates the allure of these dynamics, at long last (in part due to exhaustion?) Athens showed that it could lessen the influence of these cancers.
Read MoreThe movement to a new version of democracy was based on a partnership between the political clubs and some intellectually sophisticated aristocrats. The clubs provided the terror tactics to crush opposition and the aristocrats developed a new constitution.
Read MoreWithout question, the period of 460 - 430, discussed in the prior three Posts, were one of most important and influential periods in European history. Democracy had come of age, a powerful empire was created, and there was a golden age of cultural development and transformation. However, trouble had continued to brew….
Read MoreAlong with Athens reaching a new height of democratic governance, power, and wealth, an artistic and intellectual explosion occurred that remains one of the most storied periods in both European and world history.
Read MoreAt first glance, the attitude of the Athenians to either rule or be ruled sounds reasonable - they chose not to be ruled and therefore needed an empire to ensure this. However…
Read More
The graphic is a representation of citizenship and community as the foundation of Democracy. The small outer circles are either individuals or groups. These are connected to each other and to the center circle. The center circle is a community, large or small. The idea is that all are made stronger and more vital through these connections.
all content @ David Mead-Fox
webdesign: Pluhar Creative Design Services